Showing posts with label sexuality. Show all posts
Showing posts with label sexuality. Show all posts

Sunday, February 23, 2014

"Gay" in the News: Supporting Traditional Marriage



At the "Support Traditional Marriage" rally a couple of weeks ago, the "gay" interests held a competing rally on the same location several hours before.  Some of them stayed on, apparently intending to disrupt the subsequent rally.  They marched down the aisle while the Utah Attorney General was trying to speak, and threw glitter-filled balloons at him.  Then they fell on the floor kicking and shouting like an angry two-year-old in a tantrum.  That part was not particularly interesting to me, but it was fascinating to see dozens of media representatives rush down the aisle to make a record of the petulant outburst.  There were more cameras than cops.  The reporters swooped in from the periphery like a flock of vultures as the cops dragged them away.  Thus the protesters apparently fulfilled their purpose.

It would seem that most of us pitiful and pathetic people have an independant life of our own.  Others seem compelled to publicly exhibit a contrived "gender identity" that we must never presume to question.  That would constitute a thought-crime against humanity.

I'm pretty sure I have little understanding of what "transgender" hopes to accomplish.  As far as I can tell, what happens to a developing human takes place a long time before anyone is even born.  A bit of snipping and cutting, an excision or augmentation here and there, is not going to ever change that.  Cosmetic surgery makes changing some rather superficial physical characteristics about as easy as changing your clothes.  And as meaningful.

I personally feel that the ramifications of my own life are more important than an actor's wardrobe.  Sexuality is a human attribute, but I would think my life shallow indeed if I held that to be anything more than a small integral piece of what defines me.  Those advocates for "gay" thinking seem to be letting one obsession define the whole of their existence.  I could never be so narrow.

An associate once challenged me about my presumed "homophbia", suggesting that I should "try being gay for a day".  My impression has long been that I would find no real difficulty in doing so, in every bit as superficial manner as those who would project a "gender identity".

In me it seems to represent a character defect that I must work to overcome.  But others are apparently privileged to argue, "I was born this way".

Weren’t we all... 

"Gay" in the News: Google Plays "Games"





Even Google affirms, from the front page of their vast data stores, that Russian Olympics are "the gayest games ever".  Not really very convincing.  Still trying to grasp how the expression of sexuality relates to Olympic competition.  The Olympics still appears to be a place where the girls are girls and the boys are boys.

"Gay" in the News: Facebook Goes "Custom"


Facebook Choices


Social network adds feature to accommodate "gender identity".  A rainbow menu of new choices for the sexuality connoisseur.  I tried switching my designation to "custom" but Facebook refused to "save" my preferences.  Might still have a few bugs to work out.



What it is apparently all about.  "Gender identity" opens up a thrilling new world to the imagination and indulgence of the sexual explorer, in terms of the nuances of defining one's sexuality.  Or rather, having it define you.

"Gay" in the News: Not Far From the Tree



Now Chelsea Clinton follows proudly in her father's footsteps, to become an advocate for "federal equality" in sexuality.  News coverage reports that throughout her speech for the Human Rights Council, Clinton referenced a report by the Human Rights Campaign, “Growing Up LGBT in America.” The report supposedly interviewed 10,000 LGBT-identified youth between the ages 13 and 17.  The survey reports that 68 percent actually heard elected officials make negative comments about being LGBT.  Can you imagine - someone heard a discouraging word.

Clinton asserted that the implementation of federal laws that attempt to enforce "equality" are not an indication of success.  What the issue requires is apparently a full force of politically-correct thought police, ever vigilant on the watch against harsh language.  And rest assured that it all depends on what "is" is.

I keep trying to convince myself that what I read in the news media is ever biased concerning these issues.  Journalists appear to be largely sympathetic with "gay" issues, thus a particular editorial bigotry is evident.  But this news is representative of current events in the world.  If that is not troubling and concerning you, you may be on another planet.