Showing posts with label learning. Show all posts
Showing posts with label learning. Show all posts
Wednesday, April 19, 2017
Being Different
What's wrong with being different?
Perhaps it depends on your reason for being different. Or for being the same.
For many, lacking any rationale other than different for the sake of being rebellious, there is no real justification. And if you are the one sticking your neck out, you risk having your head chopped off.
Following rules and conforming to norms is not a bad thing. But being different as a way to show off may lead to adverse consequence. As long as we have confidence that doing something different is the result of a wise decision, it will probably serve us well.
There are sometimes problematic circumstances when being different is not altogether a choice.
An example from an earlier post...
A few years ago, when I was more able, I was hiking cross-country from the east side of US 89, out across the pinnacles area, through the Buggy Wheel Springs access. See the Birdseye comment for more detail about that area. Anyway, as I approached the pinnacles from the west, I was watching the elk. I stayed far enough away that I did not think I would spook the herd, but they obviously spotted me moving in the scrub, and started browsing away. Suddenly I noticed a WHITE animal, far on the outskirts of the herd. It was a very large herd at the time, several hundred animals, more than I could reliably count heads with my field glasses, because they were moving. But the one animal was so obviously WHITE from top to bottom that he stood out starkly in contrast to the others.
Apparently, he was albino. I watched until they browsed across the ridge and I could no longer see them.
One of the most remarkable things I noted while watching the herd was that they seemed to shun the albino member. He stayed on the outskirts of the grazing area, and the other animals shoved him or shouldered him away when he attempted to graze into the area where they were browsing. I didn't watch long enough to make any real conclusions or studies other than casual observation, but if I was making a guess, I would say that the other animals of the herd discriminated against this white colored animal because he was superficially different from them.
Draw your own conclusions.
Labels:
being different,
conforming,
learning,
progression
Thursday, January 07, 2016
Reeling and Writhing: Trauma by Public Education
"Reeling and Writhing of course, to begin with," the Mock Turtle replied, "and the different branches of arithmetic - ambition, distraction, uglification, and derision." (Lewis Caroll, Alice's Adventures in Wonderland)
I don't remember when, but I learned how to read and write well before I started attending public school. The home I grew up in had bookshelves holding many hundreds of books. I read many of them before I started school, never realizing that they were intended for more mature readers.
There was a chalk board in one of the bedrooms, and we were always writing things on it. I knew how to write my own name.
And therein lies the problem. I knew who I was - well before public school teachers presumed to teach me different. Although learning at home was a good start to my personal education experience, when I started attending public school, it all came off the rails. For what I have learned though my life, I gratefully thank my parents. Public school teachers taught me more bad habits than good.
Not such a problem in kindergarten. As I recall, we didn't have to do much writing in class. And no reading at all. I read at home. A LOT.
My first grade teacher at Aurelia Pennekamp Elementary School was Mr. Marcus. I thought he was a mean man.
He insisted that my name was David. I knew it wasn't. Everyone who knew me called me "Jimmy".
Later on in my life I realized that most institutions mechanically and thoughtlessly recorded my formal name as "David James Cobabe", invariably shortened to just "David Cobabe", with no recognition of the fact that by preference or tradition, some are called by their middle name. The nearly universal first-name-centric bigotry continues to irritate me to this day.
Mr. Marcus insisted that I should not be writing with my left hand, and consistently censured me for attempting to use my left hand. He tried to "cure" me. Left-handed writing in the first grade was doubly problematic. Not only was left-handedness treated unkindly, but the coarse paper medium and soft pencils tended to smear across the page as lefties tended to drag their pudgy fist across the paper. Throughout the first grade, the side of my left hand was chronically discolored shiny gray, from a soft pencil smear, while my handwriting consistently earned me poor marks, no matter how laboriously I tried.
With my messy and smudged printing, I could never please that teacher, though I was trying to perform the way I had learned at home. It was my first encounter with such an authority figure that tried to force me to change my personal habits. It was an emotional confrontation, and has colored my perception ever since.
One of our first grade learning exercises was group reading. Students would arrange their little chairs in a circle facing in, and take turns around the circle, attempting to read a few sentences out loud. I chafed impatiently as other children stumbled along, slowly reading the simple texts, almost incoherently at times. I was certain that they were putting on a stupid act just to infuriate me. Nobody with even a minimal level of reading skills could be that pathetic. Usually I had read silently ahead though the whole book in just a few minutes while the rest of the students were still perusing the first few pages. They were always pointless little pretend books anyway, unlike the interesting literature I was discovering at home. "Fun with Dick and Jane" was never any fun.
My own impatience with other students was my downfall. I became bored, and ceased from paying attention. This practice turned into a lifelong habit - my biggest lesson from public education.
I also suffer from a serious problem with respect for authority. Particularly when the authority seems to come from someone manifestly less capable, especially in cognitive skills. I have long been an observer of the Dunning Kruger effect, even before it became the subject of an academic study. And I blame my first grade school teacher in part.
Additionally, I have struggled for my whole life with public difficulties related to my last name. "Cobabe" has been mangled, misspelled, and mispronounced in every conceivable manner. And quite a few that are not. "Cobain", "Cobage", "Cabbage" among some of the creative renderings. I have been named "Co-bob-a" by any number of Spanish-speaking associates. From time to time, I get solicitations from porno sites to join the party, celebrating a more perverted twist on the "Cobabe" name. The more practical telephone contacts almost inevitably ask how to they should spell "Cobabe", and almost always have trouble with pronunciation. I can generally tell when they are reading my name for the first time from a document or a computer display. That they frequently think my name is "David" is an additional giveaway.
When I hear that my last name is an unusual one, I frequently reply that it is quite common in my family. The typical nonplussed non-comprehension reaction seldom fails to gratify my passive-aggressive inclination.
I have grown impatient and intolerant of careless or deliberate misspelling, whether my own or from others. I am adamant that we should always take note and correct our mistakes immediately, or that we should do this for others. Not as a way of showing off my superiority in most cognitive skills. That was never in question.
I want to make it a point that I respect other people enough to learn how to spell their name correctly. My own feelings have been hurt enough times that I am hypersensitive about it. Not presuming to be the spelling Nazi. Just a simple gesture of common respect.
One nit-picky example. A few years ago, someone at the State of Utah Driver License Division spelled my last name wrong in transposing it from a hand-written application. I did not notice the error until quite some time later. My last name was misspelled on the plastic card that represents a "permanent" driving license in Utah.
When I returned to the DLD and reported the error, they accused me of misspelling my own last name. They wanted me to give them money to compensate them for the trouble of correcting my mistake. It was a trivial amount, so it didn't bother me, other than that it was obviously THEIR error.
A short time later, as I was waiting for the clerical correction, they happened to look up the online facsimile of the form I had originally submitted. It clearly showed that I had spelled my own name correctly.
Nothing further was mentioned about tendering the fee. But no apology was forthcoming either.
Just one example of the many unhappy incidents that stem from garbling my last name.
There is nothing terribly wrong or offensive about spelling errors. Our written communication is complex and in some instances not very intuitive. That does not give us license for poor spelling. We should correct our mistakes as soon as they are recognized, and learn to do better.
Labels:
childhood trauma,
Dunning-Kruger,
learning,
name,
pronouncing,
public education,
spelling
Monday, January 19, 2015
The Glory of God
And truth is knowledge of things as they are, and as they were, and as they are to come...
The glory of God is intelligence, or, in other words, light and truth. (Doctrine and Covenants 93)
There is a law, irrevocably decreed in heaven before the foundations of this world, upon which all blessings are predicated—
And when we obtain any blessing from God, it is by obedience to that law upon which it is predicated. (Doctrine and Covenants 130:20-21)
Wednesday, May 13, 2009
April 2009 General Conference: Learning the Lessons of the Past

Covering a topic that has been rehashed so many times before, Elder M. Russell Ballard of the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles makes the topic ring with new vitality as he reminds us in his conference address that we live in perilous times. He quotes the aphorism, ¨Those who do not remember the past are doomed to repeat it.”
He refers to a number of examples of cyclical behavior, from scriptural accounts in particular. There is a consistent theme of blessing and prosperity, then reoccurring periods of apostasy and spiritual darkness, followed by repentance and restoration of the Lord´s grace and blessings.
Our Heavenly Father loves all of His children, and He wants them all to have the blessings of the gospel in their lives. Spiritual light is not lost because God turns His back on His children. Rather, spiritual darkness results when His children turn their collective backs on Him. It is a natural consequence of bad choices made by individuals, communities, countries, and entire civilizations. This has been proven again and again throughout the course of time.
One of the most important lessons we learn from this is that actions do have consequences, for good or bad, individually and collectively. We learn to avoid the mistakes of the past by studying the lessons of history and culture. Herein lies the accumulated wisdom of past generations. Through their learning we can leverage and avoid some of the pitfalls of these perilous times.
We live in an era when the boundaries of good taste and public decency are being pushed to the point where there are no boundaries at all. The commandments of God have taken a beating in the vacillating marketplace of ideas that absolutely rejects the notion of right and wrong. Certain factions of society seem generally mistrustful of anyone who chooses to live according to religious belief. And when people of faith attempt to warn others of the possible consequences of their sinful choices, they are scoffed at and ridiculed, and their most sacred rites and cherished values are publicly mocked.
Elder Ballard counsels for each of us to strive to gain a faith and testimony of our own. His advice is that testimony is built the same way it has always been, and there are no technological shortcuts, despite all the gadgets that have proliferated these days.
And how do you get such a testimony? Well, there’s no new technology for that, nor will there ever be. You cannot do a Google search to gain a testimony. You can’t text message faith. You gain a vibrant, life-changing testimony today the same way it has always been done. The process hasn’t been changed. It comes through desire, study, prayer, obedience, and service. That is why the teachings of prophets and apostles, past and present, are as relevant to your life today as they ever have been.
Labels:
Ballard,
general conference,
history,
LDS,
learning
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)











